|
Lonesome
Town
“Have
you seen the loneliness of a middle distance runner
When he stops the race and looks around?”
-The Loneliness of a Middle Distance Runner, Belle and Sebastian
The feeling of loneliness is
rarely more pertinent than when you are sitting in a packed
cinema alone. The malady
of permanent isolation overcomes you as you look around and
realise you are the only person there without company. You
try to slink down in your seat when a peppy too-thin couple
ask if the seats to your immediate right are taken. “No”,
you mumble, as you look around and realise that the full
house sign is probably being dusted off. A group of eight
or so college students laugh among themselves and you feel,
with overzealous paranoia, that they are probably laughing
at you. Three middle aged couples, the women all over-dressed
for a trip to the movies, sit in the middle row, dead centre,
the men sitting silently while the women lean over their
partners to gossip among themselves. An attractive twenty-something
brunette comes in with her aging parents looking awkward
and clearly wishing she was invisible. In that cinema at
that moment, we were natural acquaintances in spirit. Two
men in skinny jeans and styled haircuts push past me and
wonder if I can shift a seat over so they can sit with their
friends. Another couple claim the two seats to my left during
the opening preview, leaving me jammed between two girls,
both of whom are there with their presumed boyfriends.
I am certainly not averse to doing things alone. I work
alone due to my general intolerance of others. For the most
part I prefer to watch sport by myself or at the very most,
only with those who are well versed in the game played before
us and the etiquette of watching sports. I even prefer to
be alone in transit so that when the inevitable squawk of
a baby or the chatter of the bogan travellers can be drowned
out by my Ipod.
It is only really a packed cinema where I feel uncomfortable
being alone. It is not the discomfort of sleeping against
a wall in the bed of someone else or the uneasiness of being
packed into a tram; in those situations you are usually next
to a beautiful woman or with a coterie of fellow travellers.
Rather, it is the awkward feeling of being alone and the
fear of that becoming a permanent state that causes your
skin to flush red and your paranoia to become acute.
The movie I went to see, in
the end, did little to alleviate the loneliness of the
middle distance runner I felt. I went
and saw The Wrestler and the depressing notion that people
can’t change no matter how much they want to was a
gloomy outlook on life, at best. The movie was still amazing,
however, with Mickey Rourke outstanding as a washed-up eighties
wrestler struggling to deal with the passing of time. To
a wrestling aficionado, it was concurrently a trip down memory
lane and a visual punch to the kidneys, the glitz and glamour
in the ring contrasted with the brutal costs to the body
and the mind seen behind the curtain. It was, for all intents,
a fictionalised version of the documentary Beyond The Mat
with Randy “The Ram” Robinson a melding of the
Hulk Hogan of the eighties and the Jake “The Snake” Roberts
of Barry Blaustein’s documentary. This was not a movie
written in kayfabe nor was it intended to glamorize professional
wrestling. Rather, it highlighted the addictive nature of
glory, the loneliness of the individual athlete and the costs
of success in a cut-throat world that has little room for
nostalgia.
The most compelling theme of the movie was the lonely nature
of the individual athlete and the notion that though they
receive all the glory when they reach the top of the mountain,
they must make their way down the other side all by themselves.
In team sports the glory is shared, the pain is mutual and
the experiences are collective and the trip down the mountain
for most is easier because just as you shared your experiences
at the top, you share the experience of time moving on and
the spotlight shifting away.
Some individual athletes are more adept at dealing with
the passing of time and the fading of skills and some sports
lend themselves more to allowing athletes gentler runs down
the slope than others.
Tiger Woods and golf are a prime example. Woods is generally
regarded as one of the greatest golfers of all time. He has
been in the spotlight for over a decade and due to the nature
of golf he will be there for at least another decade. When
his skills begin to deteriorate, Woods will still be able
to play golf. Any professional golfer who reached the top
of the mountain can play competitively until the day they
die if they so choose. Woods will also be the beneficiary
of a well-rounded mental makeup that ensures he has other
interests and a better perspective on life. He is also an
athlete who has never courted celebrity or the spotlight
and competes for the sake of winning and not necessarily
the roar of the crowd.
At the other end of the spectrum
is boxing. The history of the sweet science is a long and
agonising hymn to the
athlete who can’t move away from the spotlight, whose
drug is the roar and whose only way is via fists and bloodshed.
For every Rocky Marciano there are a dozen George Foreman’s
and Evander Holyfield’s, men who know no other way
and can’t stay away from the ring no matter how much
damage it does to their body and how humiliating their return
to the ring is viewed. The brutality of boxing does not allow
for fighters to continue at a high level for any great period
of time while the rush of the crowd is more acute and pertinent
than it is with a sport like golf. But that doesn’t
stop the multitude of boxers who retire out of common sense
and then return for money, competition, the thrill and the
fact they know no other way.
The fact that those athletes who decide to pursue individual
sports rather than team sports are inherently more selfish
also plays a contributing role in why many struggle to deal
with aging and the shifting of the spotlight.
Golfers, boxers, swimmers, runners and tennis players seek
their own personal glory. They drive themselves, they train
themselves, they compete themselves, they celebrate their
successes themselves, they suffer defeat themselves.
Some can handle it. Others cannot.
Some athletes, of course, are
more suited to individual sports. Anthony Mundine is a
prime example. He desires the
full focus of the spotlight and is far better suited in the
ring and away from the team situation where his attitude
generally was poisonous. It is not surprising that the talented
Dragons teams Mundine played in never won a premiership despite
his obvious rugby league ability. How he will deal with his
inevitable aging is anyone’s guess but the smart money
would be on a boxing career that lasts well beyond his prime.
Other athletes who have chosen to pursue careers in team
sports would also be better off in individual sports where
their overt selfishness and yearning for the entire spotlight
would be better facilitated. Sonny Bill Williams. Willie
Mason. Terrell Owens. Andrew Symonds. These, and many others,
refuse to operate in a harmonious team atmosphere and despite
their obvious athleticism actually take away from the team
cause. They are athletes more concerned with statistics,
relative contract earnings, newspaper headlines and public
attention than with winning and the team.
While it is not true across the board, it is fair to suggest
that individual athletes have far bigger egos than team sportsmen.
It is the nature of the individual athlete and it is also
a legacy of not existing in a team environment that tends
to restrain out-of-control egos.
From a punting perspective, understanding the mindsets of
athletes is half the battle. When you understand motivation,
finding winning wagers is a hell of a lot easier. It explains
why a champion team usually fares better than a team of champions,
why team dynamics are important and why some come through
in the clutch while others wilt like May daisies. It also
helps to explain why individual athletes can tend to be more
inconsistent than teams.
More importantly, when you understand the mindsets of athletes,
you can understand a little about life. You can grasp that
we are all different, that we all have our ups and downs,
that we all experience joy and sadness, that we all deal
with challenges and pressure and adversity differently. Nothing
is defined. There are people who prefer to do it alone. There
are others who need the company of others. And there are
some who like to mix it up.
Some of us understand time
and accept that change is inevitable. Others are like Randy “The Ram” Robinson who
just can’t let go of the past.
To discuss this article on our forums, click
here.
© 2008 PuntingAce.Com
|